Home / Archives / Race/Ethnicity Questions 581-590

Race/Ethnicity Questions 581-590

THE QUESTION:
R590: I’ve noticed that while white children often have black sports heroes, and certainly black children have black sports heroes, I’ve never seen or heard of black children having white sports heroes. Is it considered “uncool” for them to do so? Would they be thought of as a “traitor” to their race? POSTED FEB. 1, 1999
Ken M., white male, Philadelphia, PA

ANSWER 1:
There is much to your observation. I believe this “phenomenon” that you observe may be directly related to basic human nature and to the heavily racially stratified society in which we live. It is human nature to identify with someone more “like yourself,” whether that likeness is cultural or physical. In a society that has made a practice of devaluing black humanity (today most notably in its mass media), black children have few real heroes to choose from. They can most easily identify with the black sports hero, who, in spite of the deck being stacked against him, has risen to equal footing, if not dominance in some sports, with his white counterpart. Most white children don’t live in a culture that promises them glass ceilings and discriminatory hiring practices, and that offers them a second-class citizenship, so they can feel comfortable choosing heroes of any color. This is not to say that black children never choose white sports heroes; they are not blind to the excellence of the likes of Joe Montana, Larry Bird, or Mark McGwire.
POSTED FEB. 4, 1999
Sam, 30, male, brown American, Toni Kukoc fan <SamAlex67@aol.com>, Chicago , Il

FURTHER NOTICE:
While it may seem more obvious that back children have more black heroes in general, you need to look at the makeup of the professional sports leagues they watch. The NBA is 75 percent black, the NFL is about 60 percent black. So of cours they have mainly black role models. Baseball, a predominantly white/Latino sport, is just not as popular with most black people. I know some of those fans, however, according to their team affiliation, have heroes like Cal Ripken Jr., Mike Piazza and Jeff Bagwell.
POSTED FEB. 4, 1999
Erik, black male, 47 <erikdb1@go.com>, Denver , Co

FURTHER NOTICE 2:
I believe that years ago, when sports were white-dominated, that black kids did have white sports heroes and probably weren’t shy to admit it. I am only 26, so I can’t readily name any of them. I’m sure there are black kids who admire Mark McGuire and John Elway. We are, however, very supportive of our own, which might explain why it appears that we don’t idolize (for lack of a better word) others. On a separate, but related note, have white men given up on playing in the NBA?
POSTED FEB. 4, 1999
R.G., black female, 26, Richmond, VA

FURTHER NOTICE 3:
It has been my experience, just in listening to the local black leaders, that blacks feel very strongly about black children having black role models. And as an outsider looking in, it seems to stem from the days of slavery. Remember, blacks weren’t always treated as equals in this country. So today it is understandibly important that blacks have and want black role model. It spurs further success and heightens the heritage. What is equally important, though, is that blacks also be taught that it is OK to have a white, Asian, Hispanic, etc., role model. We should be evaluating the role model based on his or her qualities, not color. Given the proper course, role models of every color will abound, and if we’re cautious about not rushing the process, we should be so lucky to end up with those of the highest possible qualit.
POSTED FEB. 4, 1999
B.Green, 29, Gloucester , VA

FURTHER NOTICE 4:
I can’t comment on sports because I don’t follow them. But it has been my experience that it is not acceptable for black people to express admiration for white writers, actors, bands, etc. If I had a dollar for every time another black person jeered or laughed at me because of my interests, I’d be able to pay off one of my student loans.
POSTED FEB. 9, 1999
Heather 24, black female, NJ
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R589: Although I am a descendant of slaves, I would find it inconceivable for the U.S. government to attempt to give descendants of slaves the “40 acres and a mule” the federal government promised but never delivered to the freed slaves.What do Jewish people think about the movements to return art taken from Holocaust victims to their heirs, and to repay those forced to work for no pay in German factories during World War II?

POSTED JAN. 28, 1999
Tony W., gay black male <tonyway@yahoo.com>, San Francisco, CA

ANSWER 1:
While unkept promises by the U.S. government are reprehensible, they have nothing to do with redressing other wrongs – two wrongs don’t make a right. But there are differences: The biggest is that the Holocaust is still within living memory, and compensation for slave laborers who were forced to work for the Germans goes to people who were actually slaves – not their heirs. As far as returning stolen property is concerned, I can’t see any reason why it shouldn’t be pursued. If someone killed me and stole my house, should my family just forget about it? I can’t see the logic in this. I think it’s great that those who profited immorally from murder, racism and theft should be made to pay for it. In fact, I believe compensation should be paid for the countless slave laborers who are not still alive to collect it – and that the money should go into a fund to help victims all over the world. Unfortunately, no matter what restitution is made, no amount will ever bring the millions murdered back to life.
POSTED JAN. 29, 1999
Gregg, 45, white Jewish male <gregg1@alumni.ksg.harvard.edu>, Boston, MA

FURTHER NOTICE:
I think it’s totally appropriate to return stolen property to its rightful owners and to compensate people for wrongs done to them. And it shouldn’t matter whether those victims are the still-living survivors of the Holocaust or the descendants of black slaves. For what it’s worth, some people think Affirmative Action programs are a form of compensation for past wrongs. I don’t necessarily agree with that – it’s a simplistic position, and there are other logical public policy reasons for Affirmative Action – but some people do think that.
POSTED JAN. 29, 1999
Andrew, 35, Jewish male <ziptron@start.com.au>, Huntington , NY
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R588: It has been my observation that white women often look older than their true age, whereas black women often look younger. I would like to know if anyone else has noticed this and could explain why. (I have noticed this in people of all complexions, so I don’t think it is due to tanning).

POSTED JAN. 26, 1999
Gregory, 21, black male <december@brigadoon.com>, Olney, MD

ANSWER 1:
I’m an African-American woman of 34 and constantly receiving looks of shock and surprise when I tell folks my age (most think I’m at least 10 years younger). I believe that it has something to do with the melanin and elasticity in black skin. I had this same conversation with a 24-year-old white co-worker who noticed the same thing.
POSTED JAN. 27, 1999
Samm, 34, African American, female, Boston, MA

FURTHER NOTICE:
I’m afraid it does have something to do with tanning, but basically the fact is that white people have less melanin (protection) in their skin, which causes more skin damage, i.e., wrinkles, etc. Since black people have more melanin, they are less likely to wrinkle as badly. Also, one’s weight (not related to race) makes them more or less wrinkled. I rarely see a heavy person with wrinkles, but watch them lose the weight and then you see them!
POSTED JAN. 27, 1999
White female, 43, Orange, CA

FURTHER NOTICE 2:
African Americans in general age very well. Look at Ossie Davis and Ruby Dee; they are in there late 70s and early 80s and look extremely good.
POSTED JAN. 27, 1999
Janet, 31, female, African American, Capitol Heights, MD

FURTHER NOTICE 3:
I agree. I find black women to be very attractive, and one of the features I like is the the healthy look of their complexions. Tanning doesn’t produce the same result – in fact, tanning generally causes white skin to age.
POSTED JAN. 28, 1999
Gregg, white male, 45 <greggas@geocities.com>, Boston , MA

FURTHER NOTICE 4:
As a plastic surgeon, it is my experience that there are a combination of factors: The amount of collagen, elastin, thickness and other components of the skin varies with race, age, care and other factors. The answers above show that people mostly take in consideration that only melanin is responsible for the younger appearance of black skin. This is partially true, because it is a protection against sun damage, which can cause early signs of aging. But there are many other differences that are responsible,and that is why black, Asian and Spanish descendants’ skin usually looks younger.
POSTED FEB. 2, 1999
Rosi, FL

FURTHER NOTICE 5:
I too nave noticed this physical trait in white women, but have also noticed that many white women exhibit (in my opinion) unparalleled inner beauty and benevolence, coupled with a more defined sense of femininity and demurity, which I attribute to their Puritanical upbringing. I do not usually prefer women with attitude, black or white, but when I meet a black woman with the aforementioned disposition, I find myself very attracted to her inner soul.
POSTED FEB. 12, 1999
Alonzo C., 32, black male, Jacksonville, FL
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R587: Why would blacks allow other ethnic groups to do business in their communities, when black entrepreneurs have not been given the same opportunities (outside of mainly government contracts) in other ethnic communities?
POSTED JAN. 20, 1999
Cindy M., white female, Somerset, NJ

ANSWER 1:
I don’t think it’s a question of “allowing” people of other races to build businesses in the black community. A lot of times it is just that African Americans don’t have the capital to purchase that empty store on the corner and begin a business, or that blacks have not been offered the opportunity to learn what it takes to start and run a business. At many of the high schools here in Chicago (at least up until about 10 years ago) most of the students were steered toward the service or trade professions (laborers and such), and they weren’t taught the rules of business. Therefore, I think there is some trepidation on the part of blacks to invest such a great amount of money and time into owning their own business.

Also, blacks have not taken advantage of the networking that can be used to start a business. Many of the small businesses are the result of families pooling their resources to open a store. Asian families, for instance, often form “investment” groups, where each family will put money into the pot and let the first family use it to start a businesses. That family will then put a larger sum of money back into the pot, and the second family will start their business, and so on. And finally, many of the empty storefronts in less-affluent black neighborhoods are relatively cheap, allowing other groups to get them for practically nothing. As for blacks building stores in other neighborhoods, there are a lot of factors, including the ones mentioned above, as well as the reluctance on the part of some real estate developers to sell to blacks, and the general animosity and reluctance to shop there on the part of some whites in the neighborhood, which would make the business unprofitable.
POSTED FEB. 15, 1999
Ken G., African-American male <KennyG9@yahoo.com>, Chicago , Il

FURTHER NOTICE:
Blacks do not have the opportunity or the economic power to make such determinations.
POSTED FEB. 15, 1999
Black Female, Dallas , TX

FURTHER NOTICE 2:
No community can pass an ordinance banning a particular business based on the race of its owner. That’s unconstitutional. I’m sure you wouldn’t advocate harassment, vandalism or theft in the name of civil unrest. And if you are suggesting a boycott, consider that despite all sweatshop horror stories in the news, you can’t get the average American to even look for a “Made In The USA” label on clothes (not that that’s a guarantee, anyway).

What you are proposing could have a great deal of economic impact to a huge number of people, some of whom may not even share your cause. Have you considered the additional cost and inconvenience to the members of these African-American communities? Besides, if a Caucasian- or Hispanic- or Asian-run business locates itself in an African-American community, provides a valuable service at a fair price, employs African Americans from the neighborhood and contributes taxes and fees to help support community efforts, why would you feel the owner of that shop should be punished for any reason?

Finally, all Americans, including African Americans, are free to live where they wish, attend school where they wish and start and conduct business of whatever type and in whatever location they wish, subject only to the same laws that all Americans must follow (unless you’re rich enough to hire a good lawyer, but as we’ve seen African Americans can do that as well, and besides, that’s another argument).

It seems to me that your questions are really getting at “Why doesn’t the black community respond to the racism directed at them (and there is plenty of that to be sure) with racism directed at others?” The answer is that they do, but no racism is justifiable, and none should be encouraged. Two wrongs do not make a right.
POSTED FEB. 15, 1999
Mark, 32, white male, Alexandria , VA

FURTHER NOTICE 3:
To Ken G: If black people are able to put Nike, McDonalds, etc. on the map as viable business institutions, then why don’t they have a few hundred million dollars to invest in their own economic advancement? Are not black people in the United States the most educated and richest persons of African descent on the planet? What is keeping them from moving their money toward their own economic benefit?

To Mark: I do not believe blacks are “free to live where they wish” due to the fact that the majority of whites will not accept integration beyond 8 percent. Whites have decided not to allow them to live and attend schools in their all-white neighborhoods. Also, what “racism” do you think black people have practiced against whites or any other ethnic group in this country? Did black people ever pass laws restricting your people’s human rights? Did they force your people into enslavement? Hang your ancestors from trees and balconies? Redline your community? Has an unarmed white man ever been shot at 41 times in his home by a black police officer? Did black people ever force whites to adopt African names, religions and cultures as their own? Do black people have a history of bombing and/or burning white churches? And has there ever been a black person who kidnapped a white man, tied him to the back of a truck and dragged him, causing his body to sever into pieces? Have these things ever happened to a white person in this country’s history?
POSTED MARCH 17, 1999
Cindy M., white female, Somerset, NJ
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R586: Why do blacks continue to support integration in schools and residential housing when statistics show that whites will not allow the overall percentage of blacks in their neighborhoods or schools to go above about 8 percent?
POSTED JAN. 20, 1999
Cindy M., white female, Somerset, NJ

ANSWER 1:
Whites and blacks do not have a shared definition of integration. For example, most whites tend to interpret integration as “the personal and systematic threat of contamination by blacks” while blacks see it as “a strategic means of attaining necessary social and environmental resources.” In fact, for blacks, integration has less to do with a desire to be more intimate with or in closer proximity to whites and more to do with the need for economic and educational security and preparedness. Hard-working, goal-oriented and civic-minded persons of all colors have in common a desire to live free, safe and uninterrupted. However, because of skin differences and cultural misunderstanding, it is difficult to convince even the most open-minded that whites and blacks can co-exist cooperatively. Poverty erodes both institutions and spirits, yet has little effect on intelligence or ability. On the other hand, wealth and resources tend to enhance the environment and contribute to achievement and health within communities (it is no accident that, on average, those who have more struggle less). Population studies indicate that blacks and whites have an equal fear of living near one another. However, most blacks do admit they are willing to make “cultural sacrifices” for the sake of their children’s education and future security. The reality of integration and the need for equality is harsh. I’ve said enough. What do other people think?
POSTED FEB. 15, 1999
Dee W., black female, <westde@hiram.edu>, Cleveland, Oh

FURTHER NOTICE:
I don’t know if it’s entirely true that blacks still wholeheartedly support integration. I think blacks, like whites, support their own self-interest. Moving into areas with the best housing, jobs and schools becomes more a matter of plain economic good sense rather then a broader integrationist agenda. If the best areas happen to be mostly white, and a degree of integration occurs, so be it.
POSTED FEB. 15, 1999
S.F., black, male <sfinley@wans.net>, Naperville, IL

FURTHER NOTICE 2:
Blacks in the United States have been begging the white man for acceptance since the beginning of slavery. And it’s for some twisted, ignorant reason – like if we change our looks to resemble whites and start acquiring things like them, they’ll have no choice but to accept us (sickening). We’ve tried skin-bleaching to make us look white, we’ve straightened our hair with hot irons, we’ve added weaves to make it flow, we’ve changed our eye color with contact lenses, we’ve shopped where whites shop, we’ve even tried to move into their neighborhoods so that we can be side by side.

What blacks in the United States have to realize is that we are who we are, and no matter what we do, we cannot make any other race or society accept us if they already have their minds made up not to (and believe me, whites in the United States have had their minds made up for well over 450 years).

We’ll never be accepted until we stand up and start fighting and killing for our rights. We have to acquire respect before acquiring acceptance.
POSTED FEB. 15, 1999
Charles, black male, Washington, D.C

FURTHER NOTICE 3:
I’m taking advantage of the inalienable rights we are endowed with, among them, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Unfortunately, not so long ago, these were denied us. I’ve been a 15-year resident of an all-white neighborhood, and in that time two families moved because of fear. They periodically come back to visit old friends and have admitted they were afraid we would “run the neighborhood down.” I support integration because you can’t run from it; there’s just so much real estate in the United States. What ya gonna do? Attach a barge to the Florida Keys?
POSTED FEB. 15, 1999
A.A.W. 43, black female <anabwi@aol.com>, Plantation, FL

FURTHER NOTICE 4:
Should they just give up and accept being ostracized, shut out and banished? Or should they continue to work for acceptance of what they can offer to society? I think it’s ridiculous to not allow a family to buy a house in my neighborhood just because they’re black, or Jewish, or whatever. It has been proven that black children benefit from school integration. They get better grades, learn better, etc. They just want what everybody else wants – a place to live, with nice people, and good schools for their kids. Would you deny them this?
POSTED FEB. 15, 1999
Kerry, 28, bisexual female, CA

FURTHER NOTICE 5:
Charles has stated part of the problem. You won’t get respect from a dead man. Respect must be earned. It is not an entitlement. Respect shouldn’t be confused with fear. I live in a racially mixed neighborhood, and I like most of my home-buying African-American neighbors. There are a few who think that I and some of their “brothers” owe them something extra. These are the ones who would agree with Charles. They are the ones who play the loud music at all hours, throw their beer cans everywhere and think they own the streets. They are also the reason that the majority of African Americans don’t get respect. How can you respect a man like a famous basketball player’s father, who brags about fathering 140-plus children? Can he support them, educate them, nurture them, give them the attention and discipline they need? He can’t control his own impulses. He’s a leech on society. Almost half the people I work with are African Americans. They are almost all college-educated. I know for a fact that several are from the worst public housing areas in town. They took advantage of what was offered to them and made the best of it. I respect them more than the whites who have made it on “Dad’s money.” It’s funny – as a whole I would have to say they are conservative, or at least on the conservative side of moderate. It must come with the education. And they’re not having children out of wedlock, either. They have my respect, as well as everyone else’s in the office.
POSTED FEB. 23, 1999
D.A.F. Sr., white male, 51, Memphis, TN

FURTHER NOTICE 6:
Most white people do not want a bunch of blacks in their neighborhoods. The result of a bunch of blacks moving in is an increse in drugs, crime and a general deterioration of the neighborhood. I grew up in a neighborhood that was a great place for children to play in. Everyone felt safe and respected each other. The neighborhood is now almost all black. There are burglar bars everywhere, and you will risk your life to walk down the street. There are junk cars and trash piled everywhere, and the property values went down to almost nothing. This is a fact of life; look in your own community or talk to anyone in law enforcement and they will tell you the same thing if they are honest. Statistics do no lie.
POSTED FEB. 24, 1999
T.O., white male, FL

FURTHER NOTICE 7:
To A.A.W.: Why is it that your “inalienable right” hinges upon living next door to white people? Can you still exercise your rights and freedoms in secure and clean communities administered by blacks? With regard to “running away from integration,” I believe that is exactly what whites have done. They have decided only to merge with blacks to the point of “acceptable levels.” Consequently, what is your solution? Would you force yourself on a group of people who, in my opinion, are repulsed by your very presence?
POSTED MARCH 17, 1999
Cindy M., white female, Somerset, NJ
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R585: I notice that most interracial dating involves a white person and some other minority. Is dating a white person a status symbol for minorities?
POSTED JAN. 19, 1999
D.L.P. <hape1264@aol.com>, Philadelphia, PA

ANSWER 1:
Dating a white person is no more of a status symbol for blacks as it is for whites who date blacks. Where interracial couples are concerned, people tend to underestimate that relationships are built upon a complex set of circumstances and conditions (e.g. shared values, timing, mutual emotional attraction, physical attraction, intellectual appeal, etc.) rather than purely a preoccupation with skin tone and race. The age-old myth that whites, women in particular, are delicate trophies or showpieces, has been replaced by open-mindedness, freedom of expression and a new generation of people who are neither interested in nor comprehend society’s antiquated preoccupation with race. Perhaps the greater status comes from both individuals being true to themselves and dating whomever they please.
POSTED JAN. 21, 1999
Dee W., black female <westde@hiram.edu>, Cleveland, Oh

FURTHER NOTICE:
I am a black female and have dated a lot of Persian men and Latin men, and a few white men. I don’t agree with you.
POSTED MARCH 24, 1999
Brigit, black female, Inglewood , CA
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R584: Is it true that black people do not get lice?
POSTED JAN. 19, 1999
Heather, female <Heeterme@aol.com>, Indianapolis, IN

ANSWER 1:
Though it’s very rare, we can get lice, too. I went to camp one year where the mattresses hadn’t been properly treated, and almost all the white people got lice, and none of the black people did. The nurse said lice don’t like short hair (guys with their hair cut really low) and that the reason we girls didn’t get it was because of all the oil-based products we used (many black people don’t have the natural oil in our hair that most white people have).
POSTED JAN. 20, 1999
Timora D., 18, black female, Detroit, MI

FURTHER NOTICE:
I read in Consumer Reports magazine that head lice in this country have adapted their legs to hold on to straight hair and cannot grip the curly nature of “black hair.” The article continued to say that the opposite is true in African countries: The head lice there are adapted to curly hair and cannot attach to straight or “European” hair.
POSTED JAN. 21, 1999
White Male

FURTHER NOTICE 2:
I heard the same thing in my childhood, and in fact, I never have heard of any black person contracting lice in their hair. I’m not an expert on bugs, so I don’t know whether hair type (curly or straight) has anything to do with susceptibility. The reason, I believe, has to do with grooming habits, but I do not agree it is oil-based products. I was always told that the frequent use of heat-styling (hot combs) and chemical perms used to straighten black hair kept lice away. The chemicals used in hair perms are at least as strong if not stronger than lindane, the pesticide used in lice shampoos. Many black people use heat combs and chemical perms in their children’s hair, making them less susceptible, whereas many white parents tend to let their children wear their hair in its natural texture.
POSTED FEB. 2, 1999
Ebonique, 27, black female <Ebonique@msn.com>, Queens, NY
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R583: I drive about 100 to 150 miles a day in Southern California, and I have noticed something: Many Asian women wear gloves as they drive. The gloves don’t appear to be driving gloves, but rather, they appear to be white and somewhat elegant. I was wondering if anyone else has noticed this, and if someone can explain why it’s done.
POSTED JAN. 18, 1999
Douglas, male, San Fernando Valley, CA
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R582: Until recently, I lived in Sydney, Australia, a city with a large Asian population, including people from China and all parts of Southeast Asia. There was one behavior that annoyed me – pretty trifling, but what the hey: When traveling on buses, many of the Chinese, men in suits particularly, put their briefcases beside them on the seat, and you’d have to ask them to move the case if you wanted to sit down. Why is this done? Fear of theft? Maybe it was me, but then I’m reasonably hygienic for a dirty white boy!
POSTED JAN. 18, 1999
Ben, 30, white Australian male <bscaro@hotmail.com>, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

ANSWER 1:
I’ve never come across this, and Toronto has a huge Asian population with two distinct Chinatowns. I’ve noticed the opposite: That the subway and streetcar behavior at the Asian epicentres of our city operate much like the transit system in Hong Kong – people pushing and shoving each other (not aggressively, mind you … they all seemed to agree with the idea of being crammed into a small space) to get in the trains, overcrowding in the trains and buses, and general scurrying and milling about.

At first, I was irritated when I had to take the subway on a regular basis from these stops and had to deal with being pushed and squished against a wall of people. Being only 5’2″ it’s not fun being crammed into a crowded streetcar or subway train – you tend to feel like a sardine. I worked as a tour guide at the CN Tower in Toronto for quite some time, and noticed the same crowding and pushing behavior in the elevators (which are only supposed to carry 20 guests at a time). I’d have 30 to 40 Asian tourists shove their way into a jammed elevator, where there was barely enough room for me to operate the switchboard. Upon querying the tourists each year I worked there, I was told this phenomenon of pushing and cramming oneself into trains, buses, etc., is reminiscent of the transit systems in various Asian metropolitan areas, where the ratio of people to trains/buses is high. I guess it’s a matter of efficiency, because I’d personally prefer to wait an extra 5 to 10 minutes for a less-crowded train than to be so close to my fellow commuters as to know what shampoo they used that morning.
POSTED JAN. 19, 1999
Taneia, mixed female, 25 <taneia@sprint.ca>, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

FURTHER NOTICE:
I would have to agree with the questioner. I too have noticed this, and although I have noticed it among many races, I have also noticed it mainly among Asians. However, it is only among the ones who dress like the upper-class. I take the bus daily, and we have a large Asian population where I live. Iif it’s an older Asian, he or she will not do this, but if it is a businessman or woman in a fancy dress, they will put their bags on the seat next to them, even when the bus is full, as if their bags are more important than letting someone else sit down, and when you do ask them to move the bag, they give you an exasperated and disgusted look. I don’t know why, though.
POSTED JAN. 21, 1999
White male
To respond
BACK TO TOP


THE QUESTION:
R581: One argument against multiculturalism is that people who support it “make-believe” that Egypt and its pyramids are an important part of African-American heritage. What are some arguments that Egypt isnot a legitimate part of black culture?
POSTED JAN. 14, 1999
Diane, black, 44, female, Durham , NC

ANSWER 1:
I think the main argument is that the Egyptians were essentially Semitic or Middle Eastern people rather than what Americans usually think of as “African;” that is, the black peoples of Central and Southern Africa. Most Americans who look like the people who probably built the pyramids would be more likely to call themselves perhaps Arab or Middle Eastern than African American. I’ve also been interested in this question, and I’ve had a hard time finding good, solid data. Some writers seem to be racist (“Let’s not let anybody think those black people created such a splendid civilization”), while others seem to be equally blindly Afro-centric (“We must prove that we black people did create a splendid civilization”). Fortunately, there were a few other splendid civilizations a bit south of Egypt, and they were unquestionably black. They haven’t gotten as much good press as Egypt, though.
POSTED JAN. 18, 1999
Will H., Euro-American male <tccwill@flash.net>, Dallas , TX

FURTHER NOTICE:
The pyramids and Egyptian culture are part of African history, but not necessarily black history. The peoples of North Africa (the Magreb and Egypt/Lybia) are of Semitic origins and not black. I remember working as a substitute teacher and having a black student tell me about Cleopatra and Egyptian mathematicians. Cleopatra (and I’m sure I’ve misspelled it and the following names) was actually of Greek descent. Egypt had been conquered by Alexander the Great, and after his death, three of his generals divided the empire among themselves. The Ptolomy dynasty (of which Cleopatra was a member) was decended from this general. If you’re looking for black African history, you need to look to sub-Saharan Africa – the kingdoms in the area of present day Ghana and Zimbabwe would be good areas to start studying.
POSTED JAN. 18, 1999
Matt, male <mroberts@stlcc.cc.mo.us>, St. Louis , Mo

FURTHER NOTICE 2:
It probably also helps to remember that Egyptians – no matter what their ethnicity – did not actually build the pyramids. They merely ordered their Jewish slaves to build them.
POSTED JAN. 19, 1999
Andrew, 35, Jewish <ziptron@start.com.au>, Huntington, NY
To respond
BACK TO TOP

Check Also

Sexual Orientation Questions 31-40

THE QUESTION: SO40: Are there any specific reasons for the lisp many gay men have ...

Leave a Reply