[Mara]

you stated that “Scientific method insists that the spiritual realm can not be proven to exist by observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning, thus it must be assumed that it does not.” actually since ‘science’ observes/describes phenomonae (not explains them), I doubt that such an assumption would be made. Of course, the observations are not perfect, as they are limited by experimental errors, both systematic and random. That doesn’t mean the observations are bad. It just means that they have limitations, of which scientists are aware. These limitations mean that the conclusions are also not perfect. Scientists will hardly ever give you “the right answer”. Instead, they’ll say things like “its likely that”, or “it’s probable

User Detail :  

Name : Mara, Gender : F, Sexual Orientation : Straight, Race : White/Caucasian, Religion : Agnostic, Age : 40, City : Atlanta, State : GA, Country : United States, Occupation : data entry, Education level : High School Diploma, Social class : Middle class,