[ken26440]

if that’s true, JustMe, then it would follow that married heterosexual couples that don’t have any children should also be denied the financial/legal/etc. benefits of marriage. Since after all, these benefits are intended to help the couple support the family to raise children, any married couple who does not actually raise children is freeloading on the marriage system. On the other hand… why can’t gay couples create child-raising families via adoption (there’s plenty of parentless children out there, many stuck in orphanages) or surrogacy? There’s a lot of resistance to that idea too, and that resistance coupled with the resistance to gay marriage gives the impression of a deliberate social catch-22 to keep the gays out of the hetero-only marriage club.

User Detail :  

Name : ken26440, Gender : M, Sexual Orientation : Straight, Race : White/Caucasian, Age : 28, City : seattle, State : WA, Country : United States, Education level : 4 Years of College, Social class : Middle class, 

[Author]

Posts