[David25864]

While everyone had sympathy for somebody with a disability, the ‘Civil Rights’ model for the law was odd. Unlike being black, being disabled is actually having a legitimate differance. When a hotel owner bars a black person, they are excluding him from something he could perfectly well otherwise enjoy, i.e. he could use the hotel room as well as any white person, it is the hotel owner’s prejudice that bars him. If the hotel owner removes that barrier of prejudice, it costs him 0$. You are actually open to use the hotel, if you CAN, but unlike the black person, you can’t. To remove this ‘discrimination’ in the ADA causes the private owner to pay for the public good of charity to the disabled thru his private funds. Well, naturally the owner is reluctant to spend his own money when he dosn’t get the benefit. If the government wants this, it should pay for it.

User Detail :  

Name : David25864, Gender : M, Sexual Orientation : Straight, Race : White/Caucasian, Religion : Christian, Age : 35, City : Washington, State : DC, Country : United States, Occupation : Architect, Education level : Over 4 Years of College, Social class : Middle class, 

[Author]

Posts