- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 9 months ago by
Nicodemus Smith.
- AuthorPosts
- February 11, 1999 at 12:00 am #6015
Jim-R30690ParticipantIt seems to me that the great majority of humor depends on someone’s misfortune. Jokes seem to be, without exceptions I know of, in need of a ‘fall guy.’ Is there a sociological history for this, or is it just a way to show relief at not being the poor unfortunate who slips on the banana peel?
Original Code GD11. Click here to see responses from the original archives.User Detail :
Name : Jim-R30690, Gender : M, City : Waddington, State : NY, Country : United States,March 29, 2001 at 12:00 am #24199
RickMemberI’ve often wondered this myself. I’ve only met one other person who truly found no humor in someone elses misfortune. Those home videos where we are supposed to laugh when a man falls off a ladder, or some other potentially dangerous situation, poignantly points out our diminished capacity for compassion and empathy. More people need to stand up and challenge the brutes.
User Detail :
Name : Rick, City : Ithaca, State : NY, Country : United States,November 25, 2004 at 12:00 am #46630
Nicodemus SmithParticipantHumor, as I understand, is a means to producing the effect of laughter. Laughter is a natural human response to a situation of large or extreme surprise. Funny jokes don’t have to use a ‘fall-guy’. But I can’t think of one.
User Detail :
Name : Nicodemus Smith, Gender : M, City : Sugar Land, State : TX, Country : United States, - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.