- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 26 years, 4 months ago by
Karen.
- AuthorPosts
- February 12, 1999 at 12:00 am #3463
Joachim-(Jock)-FParticipantIn the U.S. legal system, why is it that a person accused in a criminal court of a crime and found not guilty can be sued in a civil court for the same matter and be found guilty (i.e. O.J. Simpson)? Here in Australia, I have not been able to find anybody to satisfactorily explain this to me.
Original Code G15. Click here to see responses from the original archives. Click “to respond” below to reply.User Detail :
Name : Joachim-(Jock)-F, Gender : M, Age : 56, City : Hobart, Tasmania, State : NA, Country : Australia,July 14, 1999 at 12:00 am #42821
KarenMemberIn a criminal case the judgment is either guilty or innocent. In a civil case, the judgment gauges responsibility on a percent scale. If you are found more than 50 percent liable, you are held liable. This is why you could be found not guilty of a crime, but still liable. There could be enough evidence to convince a jury that you are liable in a civil case, but at the same time, that evidence may not convince a jury you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
User Detail :
Name : Karen, Sexual Orientation : Straight, Race : White/Caucasian, Religion : Pagan, Age : 24, City : Fitchburg, State : MA, Country : United States, Occupation : Manager, Education level : 4 Years of College, Social class : Middle class, - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Dare To Ask Talk And News About Our Differences